Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jake Van Emburgh vs Kuzey Cekirge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Emburgh vs Cekirge analysis and find out who is favored!
Jake Van Emburgh vs Kuzey Cekirge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Emburgh 1 - 0 Cekirge
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emburgh has won 41.83% of points on their second serve, while Cekirge has won 47.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emburgh, in recent form, has won 44.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cekirge has won 50.1%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.69% and 40.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Emburgh has saved 42.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cekirge has saved 49.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Emburgh has won 48.98% of matches played (W/L 24/ 25), with Cekirge winning 66.67% (W/L 48/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 52/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Cekirge has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 133/ 83), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 63/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.98% of matches (W/L 24/ 25), where as Cekirge has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 48/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Emburgh winning 1 times and Cekirge being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Emburgh winning 2 and Cekirge winning 1. The last match between Emburgh and Cekirge was at the M25 Castelo Branco, 18-07-2023, First, Hard with Jake Van Emburgh getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Emburgh and Cekirge have played a deciding set 1 times, with Emburgh winning 1 times and Cekirge 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Emburgh winning 0, and Cekirge 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emburgh has played against opponents with an average rank of 103.43 while Cekirge has played against players with an average rank of 109.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emburgh has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cekirge has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Emburgh has converted 43.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cekirge has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
54% (74-64)
Career Total W/L
60% (196-130)
25% (4-12)
YTD W/L
73% (32-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jake Van Emburgh | Kuzey Cekirge |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:17:0 | 2:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (41/79) | 65% (53/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (31/41) | 66% (35/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (12/38) | 32% (9/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (37/81) | 46% (36/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jake Van Emburgh | Kuzey Cekirge |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (4/12) | 73% (32/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 24% (8/25) | 66% (69/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (130/189) | 55% (562/458) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 71% (10/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 73% (22/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:3 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 84.81 | 98.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (492/798) | 65% (964/1481) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (291/492) | 62% (593/964) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (128/306) | 47% (245/517) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (28/65) | 47% (77/165) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (319/851) | 44% (636/1439) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 25% (4/12) | 73% (32/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (4/16) | 72% (31/43) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 67% (10/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 92% (25/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 8% (25/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (12/0) | 47% (19/9) |
Jake Van Emburgh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Fabio Nestola
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Esquici
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandros Skorilas
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kuzey Cekirge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Harry Wendelken
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Benoit Torcq
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
53%
(
31 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
56
|
0-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Paul Woerner
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
81%
(
73 of
90)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
48 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
38%
(
23 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Vit Kalina
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | ||
view more
Emburgh Vs Cekirge Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
